Not all deep linking platforms are created equal. Some are attribution platforms that include deep linking. Some are link shorteners that added app detection. And some are purpose-built deep linking tools. This feature comparison matrix shows exactly what each platform category offers.
For the platform selection checklist, see deep linking platform selection checklist. For SDK-specific comparisons, see SDK size comparison.
Core Deep Linking Features
| Feature | Tolinku | MMPs (Branch/AppsFlyer/Adjust) | Link Shorteners (Bitly) | DIY (Native) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Universal Links (iOS) | Yes | Yes | No | Self-managed |
| App Links (Android) | Yes | Yes | No | Self-managed |
| Custom URI schemes | Fallback only | Yes | No | Self-managed |
| Deferred deep linking | Yes | Yes | No | Complex to build |
| Web fallback pages | Yes (auto-generated) | Yes | Redirect only | Self-built |
| Platform detection | Yes | Yes | No | Self-built |
| Custom link domains | Yes | Yes | Yes | N/A (your domain) |
| Link shortening | Included | Included | Core feature | N/A |
Key takeaway: Link shorteners (Bitly) do not provide app deep linking. They redirect to web URLs. If you need links that open your app, you need a deep linking platform or DIY implementation.
Smart Banners and Web-to-App
| Feature | Tolinku | Branch | AppsFlyer | Adjust | Bitly | DIY |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Smart banners | Yes | Yes (Journeys) | Yes (Smart Script) | Basic | No | Self-built |
| Visual banner editor | Yes | Yes | No (code-based) | No | N/A | N/A |
| Banner targeting rules | Yes | Advanced | Basic | Basic | N/A | N/A |
| Banner A/B testing | No | Yes | No | No | N/A | N/A |
| Banner analytics | Yes | Yes | Yes | Basic | N/A | N/A |
| Apple Smart App Banner | Compatible | Compatible | Compatible | Compatible | N/A | Compatible |
Key takeaway: Branch has the most advanced smart banner product (Journeys). Tolinku provides visual configuration without requiring code. AppsFlyer and Adjust have basic implementations.
Analytics and Reporting
| Feature | Tolinku | Branch | AppsFlyer | Adjust | Bitly | DIY |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Click tracking | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Self-built |
| App open tracking | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Self-built |
| Conversion tracking | Basic | Advanced | Advanced | Advanced | No | Self-built |
| Geographic data | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Self-built |
| Device/OS breakdown | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Basic | Self-built |
| Referrer source tracking | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Self-built |
| Real-time dashboard | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Self-built |
| Data export | CSV + API | API + Data Feeds | API + Data Locker | API + CSV | API | N/A |
| Webhooks | Yes | Yes | Yes (postbacks) | Yes (callbacks) | No | N/A |
| Funnel analysis | Basic | Advanced | Advanced | Advanced | No | Self-built |
Key takeaway: MMPs have significantly more advanced analytics because attribution is their core product. Tolinku provides link-focused analytics. Bitly provides basic click analytics only.
Attribution
| Feature | Tolinku | Branch | AppsFlyer | Adjust | Kochava | DIY |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last-touch attribution | Basic (UTM) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | N/A |
| Multi-touch attribution | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | N/A |
| SKAdNetwork (iOS) | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | N/A |
| Privacy Sandbox (Android) | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | N/A |
| Ad network integrations | No | 50+ | 10,000+ | 2,000+ | 4,500+ | N/A |
| Fraud prevention | No | Yes | Yes (Protect360) | Yes | Yes | N/A |
| Install referrer (Android) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Self-built |
Key takeaway: If you need mobile attribution for paid campaigns, you need an MMP. Tolinku does not compete in attribution; it provides deep linking. Many teams use an MMP for attribution and Tolinku for deep linking.
QR Codes
| Feature | Tolinku | Branch | AppsFlyer | Bitly | DIY |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QR code generation | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Self-built |
| Custom QR styling | Basic | Basic | Basic | Advanced | N/A |
| Dynamic QR codes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Self-built |
| QR code analytics | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Self-built |
| Bulk QR generation | API | API | API | Yes | N/A |
Key takeaway: QR code support is broadly available. Bitly has the most advanced QR styling options. For QR codes that open your app, you need a deep linking platform, not just a QR generator.
SDK and Integration
| Feature | Tolinku | Branch | AppsFlyer | Adjust |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| iOS SDK | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Android SDK | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| React Native | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Flutter | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Web SDK | Yes | Yes | Yes (Smart Script) | Yes |
| SDK size (iOS) | < 500 KB | ~2.5 MB | ~3 MB | ~2 MB |
| SDK size (Android) | < 400 KB | ~1.8 MB | ~2.5 MB | ~1.5 MB |
| Cold start impact | < 50ms | 80-150ms | 80-150ms | 60-120ms |
| Open source SDK | No | Partial | No | No |
Key takeaway: MMP SDKs are 3-5x larger than Tolinku's because they include attribution tracking, event logging, and ad network integration code. SDK size affects app download conversion and cold start time.
Pricing Model
| Aspect | Tolinku | Branch | AppsFlyer | Adjust | Bitly |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Public pricing | Yes | No | Partial | No | Yes |
| Free tier | Yes ($0) | Limited | Yes (10K conv) | No | Yes (10 links) |
| Pricing metric | Clicks/month | Custom | Conversions | Custom | Links created |
| Self-serve signup | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes |
| Starting paid price | $39/mo | Enterprise | Custom | ~$500/mo | $8/mo |
| Sales call required | No | Yes | For paid tiers | Yes | No |
Key takeaway: Tolinku and Bitly have the most transparent pricing. MMPs require sales conversations for pricing, which makes cost comparison difficult without engaging each vendor.
How to Read This Matrix
- Identify your primary need. If it is deep linking, compare the "Core Deep Linking" and "Smart Banners" sections. If it is attribution, compare the "Attribution" section.
- Eliminate platforms that miss critical features. If you need Universal Links and a platform does not support them, eliminate it.
- Compare remaining platforms on secondary criteria. Pricing, SDK size, analytics depth, support quality.
- Test finalists. Integrate 1-2 finalists in a test app and evaluate the developer experience.
For a scoring-based evaluation, see deep linking platform selection checklist. For SDK details, see SDK size comparison.
Tolinku in the Matrix
Tolinku is purpose-built for deep linking. It provides full Universal Link/App Link support, deferred deep linking, smart banners, QR codes, and analytics in a lightweight package. It does not provide mobile attribution because that is a different product category. Compare it against your requirements using the matrix above.
For the full comparison, see deep linking platform comparison.
Get deep linking tips in your inbox
One email per week. No spam.
